Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
That would obviously be a case of "deceptive editing". I don't think anyone would dispute that. Another case of "deceptive editing" was the guy at NBC who edited the 911 call in the Martin case. And I think the ACORN tapes were deceptively edited.
|
I agree about NBC. Considering that the entire tapes had been out for a day or two already, why they did that was ridiculous. I think it was just a morning show time saving cut, as it wasn't an initial story release about them, it was a followup interview discussion if I remember right (didn't see any NBC stuff until after they were caught editing unfairly). But it was wrong to do so.