View Single Post
  #3  
Old 04-05-2012, 03:44 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Oh, please: the Republican party has been talking directly about specific Supreme Court cases and threatening/discussing "activist judges" for years.

Except, of course, when those judges rule to stop vote counting in Bush v. Gore, and decide a presidential race opposite to the popular vote result.

What Obama said is nothing new, even for a president. It's simply the timing.

The conservative (non-Thomas) Supreme Court judges were, on the bench, talking about political considerations of overturning the ACA. Political!

That shocked long-time Supreme Court watchers. I didn't see much outrage over that departure from convention in the media, any comments on those judges behaviour.

Good grief - two extremely conservative "movement leader" appellate court federal judges have already ruled the entirely of the ACA constitutional. The Supremes, of course, will do what they wish.

I cannot believe the double standard and absolutely ridiculous attacks this president has been subjected to by his political enemies. That is what is unprecedented.

Especially a nonsensical lower-court judge requiring "three pages single spaced" from Eric Holder. God save this country.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote