Quote:
Originally Posted by Clip-Clop
For me, it comes down to recent redefining of "National Defense" and the inclusion of DHS. DHS has been given far too wide a berth since its inception and the wording of this EO is definitely far too broad brush for my tastes.
|
"National Defense" hasn't been redefined in the Executive Order document you reference. It's an executive order first put in place under Truman, and re-upped by every President since.
It doesn't give any President any powers at all outside of his current legal powers.
It clearly, in the last page, has multiple exemptions explaining how, exactly, it specifically
is not to be construed as such.
Did you read the Snopes comments about this? Please, read that.
Rude Boy Elvis is, of course, referencing something entirely different, a law passed by Congress, and something to have due concern about. It appears he's confused the two different items. Perhaps as they both have the words "national defense" in the title.