Quote:
Originally Posted by Clip-Clop
For me, it comes down to recent redefining of "National Defense" and the inclusion of DHS. DHS has been given far too wide a berth since its inception and the wording of this EO is definitely far too broad brush for my tastes.
|
Absolutely. that was entirely my point as well. And anyone with an ounce of logical comprehension gets there too.
Unfortunately, when this blowharded sow is quoted, attacking me, I will defend myself. But no defense is really required. Anyone with a 5th grade level of reading comprehension can read my quote:
>>>
This is just another cog in the wheel of the Orwellian nightmare that Obama is trying to obliterate our Constitution with.<<<
Another, as in;
"in addition to". Get it? I still doubt you do.
Another Constitutional shredding EO, which is part and parcel for this president who's believes he's above and holds nothing but disdain for the Supreme Court of the United States.
Isn't it time for you to crawl back up a cow's ass.hole? - what a perfect occupation you've chosen for yourself...
