View Single Post
  #2  
Old 03-16-2012, 11:01 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
a lot of smaller companies will decide to pay the fine and dump group coverage, because it'll be cheaper that way. no surprise at all.
From the article:
" ... the law could just as well increase the number of people with employer-based coverage by 3 million in 2019."

Quote:
group coverage is good in that no one can be denied.
Per the ACA nobody can be denied, even in private coverage. Good thing your worry will be gone due to the ACA.

Quote:
but it can also be higher in cost for the youngest and healthiest employees, as they are subsidizing the overall cost-which is higher for some, lower for others.
Cost which is brought down by insurance exchanges allowing non-profits to participate.

Quote:
but i'm being optimistic that the scotus will overturn what is unconstitutional. there is no way the commerce clause will be interpreted as the proper tool to force people to buy a product-even if it's 'for their own good'. who wants the govt deciding that?
The Republican Party. "Everyone must be self-responsible and purchase health insurance". It's their health plan. Similar to the one Mitt Romney instituted to great success.

You're insured, right 'Zig? You take advantage of your increased preventive care benefits yet? Pap smear? Mammogram?

Quote:
20.4 million women with private insurance now can get free preventive care. That means they can get life-saving cancer screenings like mammograms and can have their contraception covered without paying a co-pay or deductible. They’re living healthier lives while saving money at the same time.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote