Quote:
Originally Posted by dellinger63
I think it's all about choice.
Ms. Fluke and all women certainly should have the choice to receive contraception.
But religion and specifically the Catholic church should be allowed the choice to stay away from providing something that goes against church doctrine and again if we are to believe Obama & Co., the cost of omitting coverage would result in paying a higher premium.
Should Ms. Fluke & Co. want/need contraceptive coverage while in college they should avoid schools like Georgetown, Marquette, Loyola and Notre Dame or perhaps a private charity could step in and provide supplemental coverage. Then again there's the old fashion way of providing for yourself but that's a dying phenomena.
BTW there is a hint of truth in 'Catholic girls start much too late'.
Disclaimer: If at anytime viagra is covered in a group policy bc pills certainly should as well.
|
it is, has been since day one.
again, if you open the door to religious reasons to opt out of certain coverages, the amount of items being excluded would rise tremendously. or do you keep ignoring that.
also, again, the church already has yielded the point in many states with this same argument.
men get sex pills paid for, women don't. are their medical reasons for viagra other than sex? not that i know of. the pill? yes, many.
yet insurers cover tubals and vasectomies. so, permanent sterility? ok... flexible sterility? tough luck.
you guys keep saying the issue is personal responsibility, but its not. the issue is there is a double standard.