Quote:
Originally Posted by paulo537
Do I understand you correctly?
Even though:
Rick Scott (obviously non-Latin) got only 1% less of the Latino vote than he did overall.
Rubio got 4% less of the Latino vote than he did of the overall,
You mean that there is nothinlittle to infer regarding Rubio's ability to significantly affect the Latin vote?
I understand your points, you may be right.
But to me, when a Latino candidate's Latin vote percentage don't even match what he got overall, I think that's meaningful.
|
I dont think that 51% in a 2 person race is better than 45% in a 3 person race especially when the 3rd person in the race came from the person in questions party. Was the 45% an overwhelming percentage? No but again the original remise made by Riot was that in general Latio's dont "care" for Rubio. Well 45% of the voters in the Senate race cared enough to vote for him. As I said if Rubio were to be on the ticket I guarantee that you wont see similar %'s from hispanics that Obama saw from blacks but more because of party politics not because Latino's dont "care" for him.