Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
i agree actually. i don't get why employers have the 'right' to test anyone. it's not exactly constitutional.
|
His employers arent testing him, the state which grants his professional license is. In his case he has a conditional license so he is held to a different standard.
I have a hard time believing that you are going to get much support for letting someone who is impared ride a horse going 40 mph. This is different than testing a stockboy at Wal-Mart for weed.