Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis
What was so shocking about the number, Vic? They crawled and came home slow
Split times - R4) 23 / 46.3 / 1.11.3 / 1.17.4 (1.17.93)
32k claimers immediately preceding - R3) 23 / 46.1 / 1.09.3 / 1.15.3 (1.15.79)
The only thing particularly impressive, visually or otherwise, about that performance is where they found the plugs to line up with him.... I don't take anything away from him - a win is a win and he got the job done without urging, in nothing more than a typical workout fashion - that number is generous if anything at all.
|
Maybe shocking is not the right word. However he seemed to look like he was running better than a 65. Again, that's why I trust the figures much more than my eye. Even after 30 years.