Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Try to keep up. I'll type slowly for you, Dell:
Insurance companies will often stop insuring you for something you have had in the past. It's called "pre-existing conditions". Although my one joint with arthritis secondary to meniscal injury is literally gone (replaced with titanium), and I have zero other arthritis, and I have resumed 100% complete function as I had prior to injury, the insurance company will no longer insure me for any "osteoarthritis" in the future.
Do you think that's fair? That if, 25 years from now, I develop arthritis in a hip, the insurance company should not have to cover it?.
|
You are more prone to develop arthritis because of titanium in your knee and although you should not be refused coverage for future arthritis treatment you certainly should pay a higher rate than someone without a titanium knee.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
And no. You are not paying for me. I am paying for me. You've never seemed able to understand what health care was actually passed,.
|
You seem to think setting up these exchanges was magic, free or that the Department of Health and Human Services is a non-profit charity. True fellow citizens of KY will ultimately be responsible for subsidizing your care directly I will be subsidizing those whom the government deems deserving of such including Kentuckians.