Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
just because one sees flaws in the plan doesn't mean one is a tea party member.  that's overly simplistic, don't you think? |
I think it's overly simplistic to not bother to really look at the plan, or try and find out the details and what the intent is, thus dismissing it out of hand because one has jumped to the false impression that most or even a majority of the jobs are superficial teenaged jobs.
No. The majority of the jobs are skilled, leave tangible hard results (repair, construction, teaching) and will possibly require some retraining of the 99 weekers (which is addressed in the plan)
Your tax question is a good one.