Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
thats not how it works, Ms person who skews everything to try and jusify her garbage.
810 million dollar grant. thats what you've been arguing Wisconsin should have accepted the entire arguement. dont skew now.
810 millions dollars paid for by the maybe 100 millon taxpayers. $8.
|
I didn't skew, Ms person who is spewing weirdness and apparently didn't read all my previous post?
I said: "Now, your argument is that it is
better to pay their share of only $24 million, and not have the equipment upgrades, new trains, new track, new lines which you say won't make profit, jobs, etc;
than pay their share of the greater cost among the 50 states. Well, Walker agrees with you."
Now, if you want to get an accurate number, don't forget to add interest to the $810 million grant, and spread it over 10 years.