Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunbar
Why can't their ROI be good? I'm no expert in betting Pick 6's, but it's not obvious to me that getting 3-1 disqualifies them from having a good ROI.
This isn't obvious to me, either. Why can't a single ticket cover most of what you want to bet?
--Dunbar
|
I'm not against it the caveman theory at all. But 90k?
Just yesterday they owned 2.4% of the ENTIRE pool and I personally think they could have done ALOT better with (3) 35k tickets.
With 100k to spend, you can get REAL creative with how you structure, it is basically unlimited because at some point you have to trust your opinions. For example, if I had 100k to spend I probably would have had three tickets that had 1 singles on it each.
I just feel one ticket for 90k considering the sequence was the wrong way to do it, was lazy, and was not thought out throughly.