Quote:
Originally Posted by MaTH716
I don't understand how you can say it was pathetic. I honestly don't think this was a easy call either way. The only reason why I thought that they got this one right was that the interference could of cost the 2 a placing. I don't think he was going to win, but he possibly could have ran second.
I do think they have dropped the ball on occasion with dq's/non-dq's (which stewards haven't) on things that looked like no brainers. This had to be an extremely tough one to rule on and while people are entitled to their opinions, I think call it pathetic is going a bit overboard.
|
I don't understand how you say she couldn't have won but could have been second. The winner, that was taken down, won by a short margin....was she going to get her nose between those two....but couldn't win?
To me, the takedown was pretty much cut and dried. It seemed apparant watching the race live.