Quote:
Originally Posted by RolloTomasi
Instead of having an interesting Strub series, Santa Anita and its ridiculous stakes schedule has made it possible for John Sadler to keep his two top 4yos apart without even having to ship either one out of town.
Despite winning separate stakes for straight 3yos on the same day at the same track, Twirling Candy and Sidney's Candy won't clash in the second leg, the San Fernando. Twirling Candy will simply await the final leg, the Strub.
Will Sidney's Candy, presuming a good effort this weekend, return for a showdown? Unlikely.
In all probability, Sidney's Candy will simply sit the next one out, just as his stablemate is doing here.
If for some reason, Sadler decides Sidney's Candy needs another race 3 weeks from now, he still won't have to pit him against Twirling Candy in the Strub.
The day after the Strub, a 9f race for 4yos, Santa Anita will also run the San Antonio, a 9f race for 4yos and up.
It's pure genius.
|
Aren't the two of them just sprinters anyway? LOL
Why in the world would a trainer pit his horses against each other in 100/150k races? it sucks that they are both controlled by Sadler but how can you blame him, doesnt he and owners make more money if he wins two races instead of a first and a second. I would have sent Sid to GP for the Donn. I think he could win that race and it would be a nice G1 for the stallion page.