Thread: START Treaty
View Single Post
  #11  
Old 12-23-2010, 08:45 AM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Goes directly to the major amendment regarding defense systems the GOP was trying to make in order to halt the treaty from passage and cause renegotiation with the Russians, but of course you know that. And you knowing that I supported passage of the START treaty would predisclose you having to even ask "what I thought" about missile defense systems past or present being included in START, but of course you know that, too :-)
Then I give you credit for raising your hand.

What's next taking helmets and flak jackets away from the troops? New 'green' fiberglass destroyers? Heck maybe we can recycle coffee cups into tanks?
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote