Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
The rings are all that matters.
He wasnt saying that the best rotation ever is based off rings. He was saying it doesnt matter if you have the best rotation ever if you dont win the rings. he's right.
|
It's all good. Lee didn't win a ring in 2009 with the Phils, but he was certainly by far the best pitcher that post season and it's not even debatable. Just because he didn't win a "ring" that year doesn't diminish in my mind what he did. I still say that right now, a Giants fan can certainly argue that they currently have the best rotation in the NL even with the Phils signing of Lee. The old man of the Giants 4 is Sanchez at 28. 3 of the Phillies 4 are all over 30.