If you've listened to ATR the last few days, we've been asking guests for their interpretations of the themes Bill Finley addressed in his excellent and extensive 'Do We Need a Sturdier Racehorse?' piece for Thoroughbred Daily News. The questions raised by Finley focus around why racehorses today appear less sound, or perhaps more directly, less capable of hearty campaigns. Essentially, the question is asked "Why is a 5 or 6 start season and 8-12 start career typical for today's 'best' horses?"
Here is the pdf:
http://www.thoroughbreddailynews.com...0Racehorse.pdf
It's a fascinating topic that has no one 'correct' answer...
Has breeding weakened the thoroughbred?
Are training methods to blame?
Under or Over training/racing of young horses?
Lasix and other medication reliance?
Track surfaces?
Bloodstock or Horse Owner economics?
Trainer statistical awareness and effect?
Sheet figure 'bounce' philosophy?
Please read Finley's piece, vote in the poll and share your extended thoughts. I think it's as important a discussion as there is regarding the game currently.