Why is it that the focus is always on the Zenyattards? Nobody with a brain is making (or has made) outlandish claims about the mare. Of course, nobody with a brain is picking QR to win the Classic, either. Or making the ridiculous claim that Z wouldn't hit the board in the Classic -- or that Blind Luck is a better closer. Of course, these claims weren't put forth by the opposition equivalents to the Ztards but by supposedly VERY VERY knowledgeable horseplayers.
When you hold such beliefs, and you're proven ridiculously WRONG, the only recourse is to come after the Zenyattards. After all, those holding them have been LAUGHABLY discredited for any of the non TARD Z supporters; and just about everyone else, for that matter.
When you're DRUGS, for example, and you're Classic pick is the same as Mike the EUNUCH's (arguably #1 Z basher) or Tom's (#1 alltime for money spent on other people's ideas/programs) or RH10'
, it sort of puts things in perspective. ha ha ha
If you're a BEYERITE, you're feeling vindicated by the head win. Empowered even. If you thought that Blind Luck was BETTeR than Z, like one of our more prominent Fig makers, you're putting your woeful trip handicapping/intuitive pace comprehension skills on display by claiming that Z got a perfect trip and Fly Down got the worst of it.
Whatever gets you through the day.
It all makes for some nice comic relief.