View Single Post
  #8  
Old 11-05-2010, 04:03 AM
NoChanceToDance's Avatar
NoChanceToDance NoChanceToDance is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: I live in a world of mystery
Posts: 2,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedigree Ann View Post
What shows up as 'good' on Euro forms corresponds most closely to what we call firm. They use a penetrometer in most of these countries that gives a numerical measure for how wet the ground is, based on how far the meter penetrates the sod under a set pressure. In the form, each of the terms - good, soft, heavy - corresponds to a certain range of meter measurements. And this doesn't take into account a frequent situation on some British tracks, where conditions can be described as "good to soft, soft in places"; tracks that have undulations will have spots where the water is more concentrated.
I would see it slightly differently to that. Our "good" is no where near your "firm" that's for certain. Your tracks are graded much faster to ours. For example - your "firm" would equate to "firm" or even "hard" in euro format.

Your good tracks would probably be classed as good to firm for us.

whereas our good tracks are probably on the soft side of good for you guys.

Michael Stoute isn't certain to run Workforce in the turf because of the firm track, so that tells you how firm it is.

our tracks are rated as follows:
Hard
Firm
Good to firm
Good
Good to yielding
yielding
yielding to soft
soft
heavy
__________________
Avatar ~ Nicky Whelan

and now we murderers because we kill time
Reply With Quote