Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerS
Then just do away with the Breeders Cup then. If the races are so meaningless.
If those horses are superior shouldnt they win easily?
Dont you see you have it set up so that you cant lose? Thats what I mean by east coast bias.
if she wins there is no backing down. Its still faint praise and no HOY. But if she loses I can only imagine the outcry.
Reminds me of the Easy Goer fans
|
So wait, because Breeders' Cup winners aren't ironclad locks to win their division's award, the BC is meaningless? Just stop it.
I can't lose? What are you talking about? I don't think her campaign has been HOY worthy, Classic win or no. That's illogical and biased? It's realistic.
I think she's terrific, regardless of what happens next Saturday. I've said all along that her winning would make me sad, not because I don't want her to win, but because it would prove that she really could've been a total beast if they'd challenged her once in a while.
The award, as it's defined, should not be about who wins the Breeders' Cup. It should not even be about who the 'best' horse is. It should be about who accomplished the most throughout the year. No matter what way you try to spin it, regardless of what happens at Churchill, that isn't Zenyatta in 2010.