Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
The stats I'm talking about are peer-reviewed scientific studies.
Sorry to see you call all that research, "a gigantic waste of time", especially as you admit you've not looked at any of it.
I didn't say that - I said that's not been proven statistically significant yet. It may, over time.
Out of hand. Very well. Okay.
|
Peer reviewed scientific study sounds really important until you realize that the reporting of breakdowns and/or injuries has not been done on a whole scale, organized manner until 2 years ago. So all those genius scientists must have had magic wands to interpret data that was incomplete at best and misleading at worst.
Comparing trotters and thoroughbred turf horses seems like an apples and oranges argument.
It also may not over time. It is all just speculation as are most of the conclusions that have been reached so far. So saying that synthetic tracks are safer than dirt tracks is not backed by valid numbers.
Useless is useless.