Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
Of course he didn't run 100 this weekend. He ran much closer to 109 than 100. How can that be your evidence and you are miles wrong?
As for Shirreffs, please about the string already. He has 59 starts all year.
|
You are right. I was thinking that Blame ran a 105. I was mixed up with Lookin' At Lucky. He ran a 105.
That would hardly be evidence even if I was right. It wouldn't prove anything. I was just looking for an example off the top of my head of a horse that stepped up and ran faster than they normally do, in defeat in a fast race. I gave a bad example since MM did run about a 107 or 108 in the Whitney.