Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid
No, it didn't. You rambled about age and sex restrictions in an attempt to isolate the Woodward and Classic and ignore the rest of Rachel's indisputably superior campaign. Not going to cut it ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
|
I did not ramble at all .
The only two races that were unrestricted were the Woodward and the Classic . Ergo they are the only two comparable WITHIN THAT FRAMEWORK...
Whether Rachel's campaign was superior or not is where the rambling comes in--from you .
I NEVER mentioned whose campaign was the better and it was not germaine to the discussion, which you quickly ducked, feinted and brought in defense to...
Some folks need to move on from 2009, and simply can not in the face of a real let down .
While it is disappointing that both horses could be more aggressively raced, one doesn't ship, and the other ships to escape ...