Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski
Saying I don't understand the betting aspect of the game is pretty LOL funny.
I am very familiar with the pool sizes of PID. Let's do a little exercise here: The last race run had a mutuel pool of $14,219. For argument's sake let's say 50% of that was the win pool ($7,109) and takeout at PID on WPS is 17% ($5,901). The winner went off at 4.4-1, which means he had $1,093 on him to win. Add in your $40 bet ($33 after takeout) to the pool and on the winner and your $10.80 winner drops to $10.60 or $10.40, depending on breakage. That's either -1.8% or -3.6% on a common-priced winner, far from enough to crush your suggested +20% ROI.
FYI, for a $40 bet to depress the odds enough to eradicate a 20% the horse would have to pay over $74. I can guarantee to you anyone betting horses at PID at 36-1 has a permanent bed in the poor house.
|
How much do you know about betting that you are trying to fool us into thinking 50% of the action is in the win pool?
25% is fair....at best. Suddenly a $40 bet drops the price as much as 60 cents.
But, you have to realize this isn't the entire point. The other part of the point is that the betting crowd isn't sophisticated, which leads to relative overlays, so while in theory you can say this would make it easier to make money, there are still two problems here. One, as was already stated, even minor bets significantly change the prices....and two, the paper ROI is rendered meaningless by both the first reason and the second that there is no sophisticated money in the pools. Both factors that inflate the paper ROI would significantly deflate it in the real world.