Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
You say it is "nonsense". How So?
I agree with you that there are times when people think a horse was not all out simply because the jockey didn't whip them. I don't agree with that. If a horse is being fairly vigourously hand-ridden, they are probably all out. Whipping the horse is usally not going to make much of a difference. But when a horse is under a hold coming down the stretch and is geared down, how could you say that it doesn't make a difference? It makes a huge difference.
It makes a huge difference in the morning too. If you have a great horse, you could get them to work 5 furlongs in :58 or you could get them to work in 1:02. It depends whether the jock asks them or not. A horse will obviously run much faster if you ask them than if you don't ask them. That is true in the morning and it is true in the afternoon.
|
All I mean is that horses running supremely fast under any condition, as fast as Rachel Alexandra ran last year particularly, are expending tremendous energy whether under wraps or not. Those efforts take a certain toll on a horse and require a certain amount of respective rest to recover. I'm certainly just parroting 'sheet' philosophy here, but I've seen enough evidence of its' accuracy to espouse it. Additionally, I've learned (from Andy and Chuck) that the 'could have won by more' credo is generally a fallacy.
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad
A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine
Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. ~ George Orwell, 1984.
|