Quote:
Originally Posted by hi_im_god
because like the majority of californians, i'm pro-choice and fiorina isn't.
and because fiorina doesn't believe people on the "no fly" list should be restricted from buying guns.
those are 2 actual difference's that would keep me from voting from her.
not that i'm in love with boxer.
but i might have been tempted by a pro-choice, "i can't believe what i'm hearing" (during the debate when fiorina wouldn't oppose gun right's for people on the "no fly" list) tom campbell.
her story includes being fired by hewlett packard. and shipping jobs to china beforehand. there are plenty of campaign issues.
this is more political handicapping than endorsing the incumbent. i think the republican party in california is more aligned with public opinion in s. carolina than it is with public opinion in california. hell, i think the palin endorsement of fiorina helps boxer more than fiorina in this state.
i could be wrong. but i'd lay odds the national republican party puts no significant money in this race.
|
Why would you care who is pro-choice? It's a non-issue for a Senator. If we were talking about Fiorina vs Boxer for the US Spureme Court, then it would obviously be a real issue.