Crist goes to great efforts to compare Monmouth to Belmont again in his blog, in a negative light IMO, it escapes me why he chooses to do so other than personal bias. There is no logical comparison or reason to make such. The article is clearly to show how superior a choice Belmont is despite Monmouths best effort, which is irrelevant to anything as a horse player. The only comparison should be previous Monmouth meets. The new product that New Jersey has provided the better has led them to wager more money into the pools.
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire
|