There is a case going on right now where attorneys for the federal government have argued that citizens have no "fundamental right" to obtain what food they choose. I don't make this stuff up. Here is the quote from the US Attorney representing the government: "There is no 'deeply rooted' historical tradition of unfettered access to foods of all kinds."
They go on to say, "Plaintiffs' assertion of a 'fundamental right to their own bodily and physical health, which includes what foods they do and do not choose to consume for themselves and their families' is similarly unavailing because plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish."
These words speak for themselves. There is no way to spin this.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=153133