i think there's a big difference between deciding the govt's intent on suppressing speech and reading a mind.
for instance, what was the govts intent on banning child porn? protecting kids.
what would be the intent on banning kkk rallies? suppressing disagreeable speech that the govt (and many citizens) doesn't agree with. admirable? perhaps. reasonable? to most. a slippery slope? absolutely. so, the law is recognizable. the intent is the point. she's exactly correct in this regard.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
|