Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
from what little i've read so far about kagan, she seems to be a good choice. they had an article in the paper yesterday, along with a sidebar on some of her comments and thoughts from her appointment process as solicitor general.
|
Kagan herself argued for a more stringent questioning of Supreme Court nominees in 1995, words she can expect to hear thrown back at her by senators.
"Senators today do not insist that any nominee reveal what kind of justice they would make, by disclosing her views on important legal issues," Kagan wrote in a University of Chicago Law Review article reviewing "The Confirmation Mess," a book by Stephen L. Carter. "Senators have not done so since the hearings on the nomination of Judge Bork. They instead engage in a peculiar ritual dance, in which they propound their own views on constitutional law, but neither hope nor expect the nominee to respond in like manner."
Hopefully she is a woman of her words!!!!