View Single Post
  #22  
Old 05-06-2010, 05:52 PM
hi_im_god's Avatar
hi_im_god hi_im_god is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb View Post
Maybe we will see something like that someday. The key is that the Senate votes go to the vote leader in the state, as it helps to keep the vote decisive, which, despite its flaws, is one of the goals of the current electoral college system.
we'll never see anything like this because election laws, including the way a state's presidential electors are selected, are up to the individual states.

it's in the interest of each state to have a winner take all system to maximize their influence in the election. as a candidate, are you going to campaign in the populous state with a few competitive districts or the less populous state with a winner take all system? a handful of electors in california or everyone in iowa?

no populous state is going to unilaterally disarm. they're already underrepresented in the senate. they aren't going to throw away whatever marginal benefit is extracted from the current system.
Reply With Quote