Drugs knows what hes looking at. I can't imagine him thinking a good horse doesn't pass if there is no limitation. He was ridden like the best horse in the race. Thompson's ride had nothing to do with him not winning that race. He gave him a fine trip, and a fine ride
Drug's has a more valid opinion than you do. You throw 200 darts and hope one sticks. Drugs makes a stand on a horse and gives his reasons for liking or disliking whether I agree or not. Anybody can respect a substatiated opinion from somebody whos well studied and has a clue.
You make unsubstatiated opinons on horses, trainers, and then outright call a guy a crook that you have never dealt with in any capacity. Who would think anything you say has validity.
|