[Riot]

What the alternative result to the last Presidential election could have wrought, regarding nuclear policy:

"Governor, what should be the trigger, or should there be a trigger, when nuclear weapons use is put into play?"

"Nuclear weaponry, of course, would be the be-all, end-all of just too many people and too many parts of our planet, so those dangerous regimes, again, cannot be allowed to acquire nucular weapons, period. Our nucular weapons here in the US are used as a deterrent and that's a safe, stable way to use nucular weaponry. But, for those countries, North Korea also, under Kim Jung Ill, we have got to make sure that we're puttin' the economic sanctions on these countries and that we have friends and allies supporting us in this to make sure that leaders like Kim Jung Ull and Acmajinadad are not allowed to acquire to proliferate or to use those nuclear weapons, it is that important, can we talk about Afghanistan real quick also though?

- Sarah Palin, candidate for Vice-President of the United States of American, 2008 Vice-Presidential debate with Joe Biden

In other words: apparently didn't understand the question, didn't answer it.