Yeah, 'Zig. That was after you called one of my posts, "sanctimonious crap", right?
Calling someone sanctimonious doesn't count as name-calling or insult when you do it?
But if I respond after your post in kind, I'm suddenly the bad one?
Quote:
|
you justify doing it( you once said "he started it"---but anti-trust is five?!)
|
So I guess you missed the part where Lori called me an idiot? Then she said I
made her call me names? And that is why I asked if she were five? And you are getting after
me about calling Lori five, but that's okay for her to call me an idiot in your book?
Thanks, 'Zig, that's good to know about you <vbg>
So I guess it's not offensive to you for some down here to hurl insults at people (idiot, ****, stupid, etc) - it's just not right when the recipients start returning the fire? <vbg>
I no longer feel compelled to always ignore the rude crap some of the bullies down here fling around on a regular basis. Sorry. If you can't debate politics "like an adult", as Simon likes to say, and have to resort to discussing the poster and their intelligence, etc, expect to get it back in one's face. Judging by my private messages today and yesterday, that isn't a minority opinion at all <g>