View Single Post
  #14  
Old 09-25-2006, 06:39 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenuineRisk
Oracle, I stand in honest awe of your razor-sharp mind where racing is concerned, but when it comes to politics, I think you're regurgitating what you're getting off Fox News and not doing any independent thinking of your own. Can you give me any of those "credible sources?" I can claim that "credible sources" say Bush has a hook-shaped penis, but if you asked me to back it up, I'd have some trouble. So, what are those credible sources? If you can come up with sources from "near and far" and "high and low" I will have no trouble admitting I'm wrong and I won't threaten to set you on fire, either. And Fox News doesn't count. Nor does Ann Coulter.

Did you watch the Fox interview? I finally did, today, via Google, and in the entire context of the 15 minutes devoted to Bin Laden, I just didn't see the screaming lunatic that you right-wingers saw. I saw him refuse to get sidetracked by Chris Wallace who was soon backtracking so fast I could see the skid marks (I especially enjoyed watching Wallace gibber when Clinton asked if he asked the Republican guests the same question. Very amusing) and I saw him get pretty aggressive when Wallace tried to change the subject away from the question Wallace asked in the first place. But hey, Wallace asks a very leading questions and then, when the answer isn't going the way he wants, tries to change the subject? Wha?

I find it so funny that right-wingers will watch O'Reilly shout down people and listen to the awful things people like Coulter say but let one Democrat, just one, stand up to bullying and they scream he's being mean and awful.

Anyway, for those who saw only the 10-second blurb Fox showed in promos, here's a link to the 15 minutes of interview. Richard Clarke should send Clinton a gift basket-- he certainly mentions his book often enough.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...inton+fox+news

I look forward to the links to your sources, Oracle. Thanks for the post about the NY bred, by the way-- can't wait to go watch his race.
Why do you think Berger was stealing documents if he had nothing to hide?

It has beeen well-publicized that they had a few chances to kill Bin Laden but did not act on it. I was having a debate with a left-wing friend about this subject a few years ago. I told him that I had heard on the news that Clinton had pinpointed OBL's location and chose not to act. My friend actually knew about it. He said the reason given by Clinton for not acting was because there were several women and children in the area and a strike on the compound would have resulted in many casualties to women and children.

Oracle and I do not need to find articles on what is common knowledge. You can look it up yourself.
Reply With Quote