Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dalakhani
Im not. I just have an idea on how teams are made. Some don't. Its not about throwing a bunch of guys together and seeing if they can play together. Guys have to get their shots. There has to be players to do different roles. You can't say "derrick Rose is the point guard and i dont see a problem with that". That is an ignorant statement. You are asking a guy that has never distributed the ball in his life, never played second fiddle in his life and never had to spot up in his life to suddenly have to do these things and expect it to work simply because he is talented. Basketball doesnt work that way.
Would they be good? Sure they would be good. Wade and Bosh would be good with anyone around them. At the same time, in order to seriously contend, you would need a guy to get them their shots and hit an open three.
Anyway, it is silly to argue. I think Wade and Bosh end up together and I would agree that Chicago has a shot (isnt it wade's hometown?) but no more so than New York or Miami and I think Miami would be the favorite. What is your opinion?
|
She acts like Rose is Iverson. He isnt. That he has never played second fiddle doesnt mean he has issues, it just means he has been better than his teammates. The thought that he couldnt fit with Wade in the backsourt is beyond dumb. This isnt baseball where you cant ask Jim Thome to bunt and steal bases because he physically cant do it. Players adapt to different roles all the time. Look at Channing Frye. he went from being pretty much a stiff low post, high post player to a good perimeter shooter because he plays on a different team that has a different use for him. The idea that Rose cant play the point on a good team with other weapons is misguided. He idea that he wouldnt play second fiddle to one of the games very best players who would compliment his game and make him better is misguided.