Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
Sigh .... your debate methodology is so predictable:
1) First attack the other poster personally ("your obscession (sic)... "
2) Change the subject to something else and create a straw man ("go to a Rangers' game ..." )
3) Change the subject again, second straw man, and go on the attack for distraction ("The Dems are league leaders ... ")
My post was about Sarah Palin. Care to discuss the qualities of Sarah Palin as the leader of the free world?
My obscession (sic) is fear for our country. This complete idiot was a candidate for Vice President of this country.
If you think the Dems are the league leaders in hate speech, I suggest you get out in the real world. No, the Dem Presidential tickets did NOT say the same things about Bush that Palin said about Obama.
|
C'mon you start a Palin thread at ever shred of Palin news and your extreme hatred for her is strange.
2) That was called a joke. You know making fun of your fear of "verbal violence"
3) The Dems are far more accomplished at hate speech which is a topic YOU brought up in your post.
Discussing Sarah Palin as leader of the free world is not something that you do. You simply savage her at every occasion which is fine but hardly discussion worthy. You take offense at my characterization of you as being obcessed with palin but how exactly is that an insult? You are.
As far as the hate speech, Is the real world now only characterized by what is said by politicians running for office? The real hate spewed against Bush may never be topped.
And for your information a complete idiot is presently vice president of our country.