Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MaTH716
So basically, you throw out the entire year of racing and deterime how good a jockey is based on how they do in about 17 races (The TC & the BC). The guy could win almost %25 of the time and be in the money over %55, but since he is 0-fer the TC/BC he is not an elite jock. This is really some vendetta you have against him, huh? Your logic/thinking on this on is mind boggling.
|
what about the people on here that bash Todd for being 0-40 in the derby - it's been done on here in the past , not recently but it has been done
1 - 75 in the tc races or whatever he is and 3 for whatever in the bc ?
it seems as though it's ok to bash todd and point out his lack of wins in the big spots on derby day , bc day etc etc ,and point out that he is overrated, but it's not ok to point out that ramon layed a lot of eggs on those days as well but is is still top jock
maybe i have a vendetta against ramon or maybe i'm just doing the same thing others on here do to todd - if i have a vendetta , then you can't tell me they don't either