View Single Post
  #126  
Old 01-21-2010, 04:43 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
i'm not in favor of anything that will add to the taxpayers expense. they're trying to shut the barn door after the horse has been long gone. they should have gotten all this ironed out before handing over the money back when the banks came begging. if i thought the money would come from the ones they are trying to tax, i'd say go for it. but i just know that anything that adds to a businesses expense is going to get passed on to the customer.
The legal agreement the banks signed (under Bush) said they have to pay back the money. The small details of the technical "how" were left blank.

So are you then against any attempts at financial reform of Wall Street? Because they could pass on costs to customers?

Were you against the Consumer Credit Card Protection laws that were just passed?
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote