Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Merlinsky
I just think there's a difference between corporate sponsorship of a race and what this is. I get where you're coming from Steve, and I'm sure when the race actually gets here I'll just roll my eyes and move on. It's not like it's all bad, it's just not giving me the warm fuzzies. When a horse or a person gets put onto a race, it should be, I feel, an attempt to honor them by the sport, not to pimp their stud career. And what about promoting people that didn't do something noteworthy in the sport? Surely that's fair game if they cough up the dough. Heaven help us if Spencer Pratt's name gets slapped onto a Derby prep. I think The Real Housewives of Atlanta Fountain of Youth Stakes would be a fun mouthful. NeNe could give out the trophy.
I'm still steamed about renaming the Sir Barton, La Troienne, and Lady's Secret. At least there, it was honoring somebody though. I guess the problem I have here is that the answer to 'what's in a name?' is 'whatever you're willing to pay for.'
|
since 'the cliff's edge' is now a business venture, i don't see how it's any different than the shadwell travers for example. the race isn't renamed, it's still the derby trial.