Thread: Union logic
View Single Post
  #3  
Old 01-04-2010, 12:42 PM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis
Not that I'm a union guy, but what does this have to do with the Union? The way I read it - there was an arbitrated dispute which resulted in the union being awarded this compensation:

In September, the racing board awarded the track 52 dates under the condition that state workers represented by AFSCME Local 1805 work 130 days at the track, due an arbitrator's prior decision back in September.

Sounds like the labor attorneys for Fairmount need to go back to Contract Negotiations 101.
not in Chicago, IL, Homie don't play that way. When you have a Union that represents State employess and quite possibly the arbitrator who decided the case and also the employees who clerk, clean, fix and guard the building where the arbitration takes place, it's a stacked deck to say the least.

BTW I could care less about Fairmont personally and if it means these 6 State employees work three days instead of 75 or 53 it's all good!
Reply With Quote