View Single Post
  #11  
Old 12-03-2009, 12:58 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prudery
Not exactly ...

It only stands in a kangaroo court ...

The statement will stand ONLY if it is qualified that she won a G! against males at three ONLY after races were graded post 1973 ...

The above also implies that there were NO graded races before that, or what a G1 is is totally up to conjecture--and in the case of the Rachelistas, convenience ...
OK you win. She's the first since 1945. Happy??? Who gives a sh1t about minutiae like this, she did amazing things this year and should be horse of the year.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote