Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
There is absolutely no way anyone could say the "better horse" is Zenyatta. And thats the only argument the Zenyatta has. There is also absolutely no way anyone could say the "better horse" is Rachel.
These hypotheticals "oh Z would have won the Woodward or Rachel would have lost the BC Classic" are as absurd as saying Rachel or Z is the "better horse"
You can only look at facts and the year 2009. Its pretty darn clear once you do that and get off the hypothetical horse!
|
I agree but Zenyatta had a great year and did win the Classic its not like she is Peppers Pride.