Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
You really believe that because one lead scientist at CRU in UK adjusted figures to show that over the past hundred years, New Zealands' temp hasn't risen, it's stayed the same - that one act discredits the rest of the entire work of the world's scientific community over the past 50 years on the same subject?
The shills and lemmings are those who have mean understanding of the subject at hand, yet continue shrilling away at their straw men. Fortunately, the opinion of one unnamed journalist at a Rupert Murdock's newspaper doesn't have much influence on the scientific community. Just as the knowledge of climate change throughout the world doesn't wax and wane dependent upon who happens to be the current President of the United States of America.
There is a reason this "story" is only being flogged by people with particular political views, to a generally scientifically-uneducated general public, along political story lines. And it's not because it's a great hidden conspiracy.
Even the scientific community - who were the ones betrayed, NOT the general public - have already moved past it. |
So if a handful of Sasquatch sightings have been proven fraudulent, Sasquatch still exists because other sightings haven't been proven fraudulent yet?
__________________
"After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military."...William S. Burroughs
|