Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
For me, or for you? I suggest you need two corneal transplants. One so that you can read what I actually said, and the other to help you learn to watch a race. If you think that's a top 5 or 10 race run in the 50 years you've been watching races, then frankly, you are beyond clueless.
Have you signed up with AARP yet?
I'm not sure how to react to that. Maybe "Huh?" or "Where did you learn reading comprehension? Perhaps you should have gone to school instead of learning how to read by being taught how to order off the McDonald's menu"
If you are asking me to name a race that was more impressive than this Classic, how about the Preakness from earlier this year? Oh yeah, I can't use that one since you already mocked that possibility above. How about Arazi, or Inside Information? Or heck, even Phone Chatter winning the BC on busted up knees?
Listen man, I never said her race wasn't at all impressive. What I did say was that the track announcer grossly overreacted.
Ugh.
|
No you said the " race was not bad " and the track announcer over reacted ...I was commenting SPECIFICALLY on that quote--NOT BAD ..
No need for granny glasses, gingko biloba or AARP ..
Not bad is sort of an under reaction as you continue to qualify your being less than impressed with the race by saying you have seen many better this year--that is without naming them originally ... Now you have ...
Speaking of sight, vision and reading comprehension--where did I quantify my remark " right up there " as to the the top five or twenty or any number qualifying exactly what NUMBER I WOULD ASSIGN TO ' RIGHT UP THERE ' ????in reference to the good races I have seen in 50 years ???
NOWHERE except in your head ... Exactly--reading comprehension ..
The whole enchilada --point missed, entirely ...
Do you get it now ???
Uber ugh ...