Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
it would be pitiful for our tax dollars to support abortion no matter how pro choice anyone is. only for a rape victim or similar circumstance should it be okay for tax dollars to pay for it.
women who are too stupid to use protection should either pay an arm and a leg for an abortion.. get their "baby daddy" to shell out the $.. or go the adoption rout. Its 2009, there shouldnt be unwanted pregnancies. some people are too irresponsible and then want someone else to take care of the problem.
|
Ok, well if you get warned that you're at risk for diabetes and don't change your habits to lose weight, exercise more and reduce your sugar and refined carb intake, I don't want my dollars to go towards helping you once you get sick. I think you should be sick all the time if you can't afford it because you're too irresponsible to do your part.
If you cut your finger off with a saw while doing work to improve your home, I also don't want to help pay for that, since you should have been more careful and not greedy to want your home to be nicer. You should just be responsible and not want your insurance to help pay for your hosptial care because you did it to yourself.
And for that matter, why pay for pregnant women and their care from insurance money either? It was their choice, and if they didn't want to accept full financial responsibility, why should I help pay for the care that they brought on themselves?
Point being, it's bulls*hit to try to deny legal medical procedures to someone else while enjoying different ones for yourself.