Defining a great horse
I'd be interested to know the most important common factors that people prefer when defining a great horse.
Rate the following factors as either... very important, important, not that important, or doesn't matter at all. And pick the 3-to-5 which you think are most important.
Ability as a 2yo
Ability as a 3yo
Ability as an older horse
Ability as a sprinter
Ability as a miler
Ability as a router
Ability as a dirt horse
Ability as a synthetic horse
Ability as a turf horse
Ability to win major races
Ability to beat good horses
Ability to run fast figures
Ability to win with dominance
Ability to stay sound and race often without big time gaps between starts
Ability to carry high weight or give weight away to good horses
Ability to have success as a stallion or broodmare
Ability to be consistant and not go in and out of top form
Ability to handle different surfaces
Ability to handle a wide range of distances
Ability to handle tough trips, bad rides, and unfavorable circumstances
Ability to ship and consistantly run near top form away from home circuit
Ability to have participated in a lot of major races
Ability of the trainer. (for instance ... would you downgrade a horse like Saint Liam because he was 2-for-8 with all failed stakes attempts before getting transferred from a solid trainer to a miracle worker? Or to a more extreme, Would you upgrade the early form of horses like Rachel Alexandra and Rock Hard Ten because they were trained by guys with dismal stats?)
Ability of the jockey.
Competence of the management. (would you upgrade a horse because he was placed in illogical spots? Or to a greater extreme, would you downgrade a horse because he was placed in clever and calculated spots?)
Visual likability. (would you upgrade or downgrade a horse based on flashiness? Flashy type of horses being like an Easy Goer or Arazi. Unflashy types being like a Skip Away .. who was often best when moved prematurely and would grind out steady wins with odd action)
|