Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Do you know how easy it is for one to do what you just did? Anyone can can state a totally unsubstantiated charge or accusation against a person. This is so common on here, because it's quick n' easy. You say my logic is mindboggling. That's an effort to distract, and not have to respond to the facts I used. It's a smear. When people disagree with someone, the adult thing to do is simply say you disagree, and respond to the evidence the person used to explain their point of view, or give more evidence in support of your opinion. I don't know why you can't just say you feel your evidence is the more important evidence (instead of attacking someone with a vague accusation.) I gave you a point of view. You stated the facts to support your opinion. I gave the facts supporting my opinion. I respected your opinion, and the facts you supported it with. I don't consider it mindboggling to think a HOF candidate with 108 post season at bats should have more than 5 extra base hits in the post.
|
It is mindboggling that a person could state that having 5 extra base hits in 108 postseason at bats spread over five years somehow cancels out or trumps what the player in question has accomplished with his other 7948 plate appearances. I suppose A-rod would have been a victim of that same ....unusual....logic.
Especially when that same player has had two game winning or tying singles in the current post season.
Should Ernie Banks be kicked out because he has no post season hits?