Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tector
Well Haskin wrote a column today doing the same thing.
But let me see if understand:
If someone discusses now how she could easily lose, they have to listen to a dork like you mumbling your gibberish above?
But if they don't bring it up now, and she loses, proven liar/distortionist dalkhani is going to whine because they didn't raise it advance?
Do you guys routinely give each other reacharounds? Or do you limit yourselves to circle jerks like this?
Maybe you guys will get "lucky" and she'll break down--then you can feel REALLY superior to Jess Jackson. Yeah, you'll have shown him but good.
IC, there were more entertaining loons on AOL, but the concentration of true bitter losers is no less here.
|
So she has gone from the greatest filly ever to now she can easily lose to a 2nd rater but we are the idiots? Oh boy racing writers are cautioning us that she can lose!!!
This is the greatest logic ever. So now if she wins, you will crow about how smart you are because you knew she was truly great and Jackson is a great ambassador for the sport. However if she loses you will say that you knew about this possibility beforehand because some writers said so.
Unlike most, some of us have seen some great horses compete before. Not Smarty Jones or Curlin or Afleet Alex or whatever passes for great nowdays. And guess what? With one notable exception they all lost and no one thought less of them. Perhaps you should q2uit your insults and learn a little before running your mouth and using racing writers as your reference points.
You, my friend, may have a short shelf life around here.